Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait has also announced the result in the midst of the first phase of voting for the UP assembly elections. Rakesh Tikait on Thursday said that peace has replaced the 2013 situation in Muzaffarnagar and the results will be different this time. Significantly, after the 2013 riots, the BJP had got a huge success in the last elections. During this election campaign, attempts were made by the BJP to make the riots an issue again and again.


Referring to the 2013 communal riots in Muzaffarnagar district, Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) national spokesperson Rakesh Tikait said the 2013 result was a trial. The stadium of that trial has been demolished this time. The stadiums where these matches were played have now been demolished.

After casting his vote in the district, he told reporters that the former situation has been replaced by peace and this time the results will not be the same. When asked if a new match is being played. Tikait said that the new match has already been played and the result will be visible.

Earlier, he raised a finger even when Ashish Mishra, son of Union Minister Ajay Mishra, arrested in the Lakhimpur violence, was granted bail. Rakesh Tikait said that he will publicize this thing against BJP in UP. Talking about getting bail soon in a serious case, he said that if there was a common man, would he have got bail so soon?

Rakesh Tikait told the TV channel ABP on the phone that what can you say in the court, give bail. We have to say that if other people have got bail in such a serious case of 302 then it is fine, if you have not got it then see. Regarding this issue in the election, he said that yes our campaign will be like this. Why won’t it be What facts have come to the fore so soon, so soon someone else gets bail, in such a case, there are facts to be seen.

See also  Naidu Cried Bitterly over the 'Insult' of his Wife, said - Now I will come to the Assembly only After Becoming CM

Tikait said that farmers do not have such big lawyers, they are big men, the government can raise more lawyers with them. So it would have been found, the court runs on the basis of facts, would have given that kind of argument. Who will defend the farmers? There were probably 32 lawyers with them.